Search for: "People v. Souter"
Results 401 - 420
of 463
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2008, 8:36 pm
Dev., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:10 am
Or even just people who like grammar a lot. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 9:04 am
That changed when Roe v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:54 am
The case is Ali v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 3:05 am
Quanta Computer, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:41 am
And then there are Justices Breyer and David Souter. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 9:47 am
That is, Justices Roberts, Alito, Scalia, and Thomas will certainly vote to uphold a law passed by the Republican Party, claiming to be the "people of Indiana," that has the almost certain consequences of helping suppress the likely Democratic vote. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:08 pm
There's only 1 mention, at p. 66, of Johnson v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:57 am
We were too busy - and none of our clients would pay for it in any event - so we didn't attend yesterday's Supreme Court oral argument in Riegel v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 8:48 am
More on Snyder v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
Bush and Al Odah v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 7:24 am
The case is Hall Street v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 11:53 am
The Supreme Court's leading decision, Chevron USA, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 9:34 am
The author gives us glimpses into the people appointed by Presidents Clinton and Bush with some 1960s and 1970s appointments that made up the liberal court. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:53 am
Souter. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:11 pm
There are, according to the media, the "conservative" Justices - Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, and Alito; the "liberal" Justices - Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer; and Justice Kennedy -- the "man in the middle. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:43 am
The high court heard oral arguments Oct. 9 in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 12:52 pm
LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 5:03 am
Russell closing the courthouse doors to a prisoner, who following a federal judge's instructions filed a notice of appeal on the 17th day after a decision, when the law only gave him 14 days, prompted this outburst from Justice Souter:"it is intolerable for the judicial system to treat people this way. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:35 pm
"David Souter was shattered" (page 177), so Bush v. [read post]
