Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Wells)" Results 401 - 420 of 1,869
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am by Eugene Volokh
From Wednesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Firefighters4Freedom v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 10:14 am
While it attempted to access Tsui’s computer at his home in Canada, it “was intentionally destroyed at the Anton Piller search,” Archibald noted in IMAX Corp. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:01 am by Administrator
The Superior Court judge erred in dismissing the amended and particularized motion for authorization and to obtain the status of representative, against the appellants. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 5:24 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Superior Court failed to mail out thousands of juror summonses. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:11 am by Jon Sands
As relevant here, the petitioner was convicted in a California superior court of two crimes -- corporal injury on a spouse, enhanced by use of a deadly weapon; and assault with a deadly weapon. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
It is also well settled that courts and law societies may limit a lawyer’s expressive freedoms. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 9:13 pm
Court of Appeals decided in April to let a district judge's ruling stand in another Molski case - Molski v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 10:00 am by Marie-Krystel Ouellet
More specifically, the Court of Appeal reached the following conclusions: The Superior Court was well founded in its conclusion of the existence of a rational connection between the policy and the objective sought by the employer. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:22 pm by Heather Donkers
” – Nakatsuru J. in Morris, at para. 1 R v Morris is a sentencing decision delivered in the Ontario Superior Court by Justice S. [read post]