Search for: "People v. Terry"
Results 401 - 420
of 723
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2025, 3:18 am
Canada On 4 March 2025, the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia handed down judgement in favour of the plaintiff in the defamation case of Terris v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 4:37 am
Case Name: Negrette v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 6:39 am
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 8:09 am
We can track how people get to our site, so we know they are mostly readers of Mark Steyn or affiliated sites. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am
Supreme Court established reasonable suspicion in Terry v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am
Supreme Court established reasonable suspicion in Terry v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:00 pm
” The aforementioned 1968 Terry v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 9:00 pm
” The aforementioned 1968 Terry v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am
I like Terry. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 5:47 am
One of them is New York City’s enforcement policy, which essentially treats Terry v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Terry, No. 07-3757 Denial of a motion to suppress evidence in a prosecution for possession of images of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct is affirmed over claims that a search warrant permitting federal agents to search defendant's home was not grounded upon probable cause, and that the search therefore violated the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am
The court continued that in both Terry and Pennsylvania v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am
The court continued that in both Terry and Pennsylvania v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:55 am
The fact that the New York City Police Department has openly and flagrantly chosen to ignore DeBour (that's the New York flavor of Terry v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:24 pm
Bevin; Terry E. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:16 pm
And note that one of the key cases defending opportunities to lie--US v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
Supreme Court decision in Terry v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 6:08 am
In Hogan v 1187938 B.C. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm
In addition to the confidentiality of the information sought, a subpoena duces tecum may not be used for purposes of procuring discovery, or to ascertain the existence of evidence (see Matter of Amex v Vinci, 63 AD3d 1055 [2d Dept. 2009]; Matter of Terry D., 81 NY2d 1042, 1044 [1993], citing People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543, 551 [1979]). [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:13 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
