Search for: "People v. Vest"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,341
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2017, 7:09 pm
Belmont --Notes and Questions --Baker v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
Trump v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 12:52 pm
Moore v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:34 pm
He is always happy to correct his mistakes, once they are pointed out to him, because no one should have a vested interest in spreading untruth. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:42 am
In State of MP v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Although in People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that a civil service commission cannot mandate a rule of one with respect to appointing an individual from an examination eligible list to a position in the competitive class, the appointing authority itself may elect to be bound by such a rule. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Although in People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that a civil service commission cannot mandate a rule of one with respect to appointing an individual from an examination eligible list to a position in the competitive class, the appointing authority itself may elect to be bound by such a rule. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:57 pm
In Mugler v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:38 pm
Tokidoki, LLC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:55 pm
And those who recollect, and still more those who shared in what passed in the State Conventions, thro' which the people ratified the Constitution, with respect to the extent of the powers vested in Congress, cannot easily be persuaded that the avowal of such a rule would not have prevented its ratification.Five years later, in Gibbons v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:46 pm
TetraTech v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 9:17 pm
In one case, Goddard v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:26 am
The people who are angry at that court are angry beyond measure. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
For some reason, people who spend all day boring out gun barrels don’t want to spend their evenings with straight pins in their mouths, basting seams. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
The impact of the Blind SA Constitutional Court judgment on amendments Readers would recall that South Africa’s Constitutional Court had in Blind SA v Minister for Trade, Industry and Competition & Others unanimously declared that the Copyright Act was unconstitutional to the extent that it limited the rights of people with visual and print disabilities. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
In addition to the key case of Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern [2010] ECR I-1449 numerous other authorities such as Kaur [2001] All ER (EC) 250, McCarthy [2011] All ER (EC) 729 Zambrano [2011] ECR I-1177 and Dereci [2011] ECR I-11315 were analysed and applied to his case. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
CommentsThe Section’s comments are organized according to the 4 parts of the Draft Provisions on which the Section offers comments: (I) validity of resolutions by shareholder/board of director meetings; (II) shareholder right to be informed; (IV) preemptive rights; and (V) derivative lawsuits. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 10:43 pm
I don't want these people in my town.'"). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:33 am
With today’s SCOTUS decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 11:53 am
Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
