Search for: "People v. Way" Results 401 - 420 of 30,862
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2009, 3:04 pm
There's no way the result in this case is crystal clear, and I could easily see a jury deciding there was reasonable doubt. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 2:31 pm
 That's still a credit card.A funny way to finish up the last substantive paragraph of an opinion. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 1:25 pm
 Today's opinion breaks the pattern in a couple of different ways:"At the time of the offense, defendant was a 43-year-old computer technology worker in Mountain View. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:01 pm
On the way home, they stopped to pick up some fast food. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:57 pm
  He sees a school bus stopped in front of an apartment building with its doors open, its red lights flashing, and that little red sign on the signal arm that says "STOP" hanging all the way out. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:58 pm
  I could come out either way on this one.It's the ancient problem of how old language covers -- or doesn't cover -- new facts.Moonshadow Taggart gets convicted of buying or receiving a stolen vehicle and gets sentenced to two years in county jail. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 1:43 pm
 We still impart incredible significance in sentencing to chance:  A and B may commit the exact same crime, in exact same settings, but if A's victim falls one way, and B's victim falls another, the punishment we give to identical acts is often radically disparate.P.S. - As to how Ms. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:26 pm
 There's been a ton of litigation about that as Prop. 47 works its way through the courts. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 12:34 pm
 Even though the guy's clearly got problems, and needs help (as well as to be off the street, at least for a while), 35-to-life seems a fair piece too much for a skateboard attack where the victim refuses medical treatment and doesn't have any serious injuries.So, in the end, it seems to me that this opinion strikes the right balance.Which is a nice way to go into the weekend. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
  So the Court of Appeal rewrites the statute to insert the omitted word.I generally think that's a permissible (and helpful) exercise of judicial review, and the right way to interpret statutes. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 12:06 pm
 Similarly, the trial judge clearly cared what evidence the jury was inspecting.The only way to intrude more on the jury's thought processes would be to directly eavesdrop on them. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 4:20 pm
I was going to mention this opinion regardless of the merits, if only because of the offhandedly humorous way that Justice O'Leary introduces the facts. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:56 am by Jon
How creative do officials have to get in depriving people of their rights until courts and the people say it has become downright bizarre? [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:31 am by Andrew Hamm
“That was true in 1868 and it was true all the way through,” Barnett said; “it’s only people’s opinions about whether it was irrational that have changed, not the Constitution itself. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:35 pm
  'Cause that's the way I roll.As should we all. [read post]