Search for: "People v. Wells" Results 401 - 420 of 30,199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2012, 10:35 am
The Court of Appeal holds in this case that it's only a "de minimus" search -- and hence okay under the Fourth Amendment -- for a police officer (without a warrant) to insert a key into a residence to see whether it unlocks the door.You can see where the Court of Appeal's coming from. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 11:43 am by David Super
  Nine years after Bakke, McCleskey v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
 But the fewer people who are bound by the ruling, the fewer people have standing to appeal. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 11:01 am
  As well as the other Amtrak employees on the train who come to your aid. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 1:17 pm
Well, according to this opinion by the Court of Appeal, the correct answer is that (A) and (B) are definitely included and that (C) may well be included.I made up (D), so Justice Siggins expresses no opinion as to whether that's a burglary tool as well.Thankfully. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 12:10 pm
Yeah, at some level, that's interesting, to some people at least. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 1:40 pm
" Proving once and for all that some people don't actually know lyrics very well. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm
  It's a reasonable holding, albeit one that could have gone the other ways as well. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 3:30 am by Steve Baird
The post When a Wellness Brand is Vaped by Nicotine? [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:42 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Counsel for the Defendant may thus want to point out to the court that the plaintiff has failed to prove up the essential terms of the contract, and cite the Williams v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:04 am by Donald Thompson
Bagely, 473 U.S. 667 [1985]), as well as full details concerning any cooperation agreement between the government and a witness (People v. [read post]