Search for: "Phillip Brown"
Results 401 - 420
of 686
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am
Phillip E. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
From the next edition: Relief granted Roy Phillip Ballard v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
The minority (Lords Phillips, Roger and Brown) went further, finding that this lack of causation should have prevented a cause of action accruing at all. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:24 am
Following the High Court decision that the maximum time that a person can be held in police detention is 96 hours, including time spent on police bail (unless there is new evidence justifying further arrest), and the Government plan to introduce emergency legislation to reverse the decision, the Supreme Court has issued the following ruling: “On 30 June 2011 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom granted permission to appeal in this case and the appeal will be heard on 25 July by Lords… [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am
The two appeals in the Privy Council this week are to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Sir Patrick Coghlin. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:16 pm
The week wraps up with continuing coverage of this week’s decisions in Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:53 am
In its most recent form, this would involve all tobacco companies using the same olive brown colour for their packaging with large, graphic images and health warnings. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
Phillip Tillet v The Queen (Belize), heard 9 June 2011. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:47 am
(Thomas Brown Jr. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
Phillip Tillet v The Queen (Belize), heard 9 June 2011. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 11:03 pm
" Phillips v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
Phillip Tillet v The Queen (Belize), heard 9 June 2011. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
He has black hair and brown eyes. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
He has black hair and brown eyes. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 12:29 pm
He had a brown paper bag over his head. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
Lord Dyson gave the leading judgment for the five-member majority, which also comprised Lord Phillips, Lady Hale, Lord Judge and Lord Kerr. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
Lord Phillips reiterated, as [58], that “the HRA does not have retroactive effect”, also that its interpretation ought to mirror that of the Convention. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
The seven-judge bench, consisting of Lord Phillips, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Dyson, unanimously dismissed both appeals and upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal that the Fairchild exception to the conventional rule on causation, which applies in “multiple exposure” mesothelioma cases (that is, where the claimant has contracted mesothelioma after being wrongly exposed to asbestos by several defendants) also applies to… [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:19 am
The Committee was composed of many pre-eminent figures in media law: Chair Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury (Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Justice), Desmond Browne QC (5 Raymond Buildings), Rod Christie-Miller (Schillings), Michelle Dyson (Ministry of Justice), Lord Justice Moore-Bick (Deputy Head of Civil Justice), Marcus Partington (Trinity Mirror Plc), Alasdair Pepper (Carter-Ruck), Gillian Phillips (The Guardian), John Sorabji (Barrister) and Mr Justice Michael Tugendhat. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
In the Supreme Court the majority (Lord Phillips, Lord Hope, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Clarke) preferred a broader construction than the minority (Lord Judge, Lord Brown, Lord Rodger and Lord Walker) would have adopted. [read post]
