Search for: "Plaintiff(s) v. Defendant(s)"
Results 401 - 420
of 69,850
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Chanthanasinh v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:16 pm
The case at issue is last year’s C P Aquaculture (India) Pvt Ltd v Aqua Star Pty Ltd [2023] VCC 2134. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:01 pm
Seaworld Parks & Entertainment, Inc., in which the plaintiffs allege that the Muppets at the Sesame Place theme park are racist? [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:47 pm
It’s important to note that under the ICFDBPA, to state a claim, a plaintiff must show a deceptive or unfair act or promise by the defendant, the defendant’s intent that the plaintiff rely on the deceptive or unfair practice, and that the unfair or deceptive practice occurred during a course of conduct involving trade or commerce (Harris v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 11:49 am
The plaintiff argued that Instagram didn’t satisfy 230(d) (which makes sense because it’s totally antiquated, but it’s also an easy thing to toss into a TOS). [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:57 am
The plaintiff William Tisdale, alleges that he was working on the ship M/V ST JOHN, which wis owned by the defendant. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:51 am
Defendant sought summary judgment exclusively on causation grounds—namely that plaintiff could not show that, “but for the attorney’s negligence, the plaintiff would have succeeded on the merits of the underlying action” (Kivo v Louis F. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:02 am
Fla. 2016), the court ruled the plaintiff’s training was not a legitimate business interest for three reasons. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:04 pm
Mendoza v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:56 pm
If a shareholder plaintiff can prove that the majority shareholder has used his control over the corporation’s board of directors to engage in self-dealing, this could be judged as a breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:30 pm
Bissonnette v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:42 am
Bell v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:59 am
Duncan v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:09 am
Javier v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:09 am
Javier v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am
This means the actions or behaviors that violated the plaintiff’s rights must be closely related to the defendant’s role as a governmental official or entity. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am
This means the actions or behaviors that violated the plaintiff’s rights must be closely related to the defendant’s role as a governmental official or entity. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am
This means the actions or behaviors that violated the plaintiff’s rights must be closely related to the defendant’s role as a governmental official or entity. [read post]
