Search for: "Ponder v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 939
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2012, 7:27 am by Sheldon Toplitt
" is a golden oldie that has been pondered by Philosophy 101 students since time immemorial.Perhaps the New Hampshire Supreme Court should tackle the question, having just ruled in Professional Firefighters of New Hampshire ("PFFNH") v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 10:47 am by Lyle Denniston
That principle was established by the Supreme Court in Marbury v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 8:25 am by Kevin
(Vector One) Why Crisis Maps Can Be Risky When There Is Political Unrest (Technology Review) The Crowdsourcing Detective: Crisis, Deception and Intrigue (iRevolution) Law Enforcement/National Security Courts grapple with use of GPS technology in criminal cases (The Olympian) The Government's Brief in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:39 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  The ABA Journal is reporting that Justice Sonia Sotomayor told the managing partner of Sydney Austin's Washington, D.C. office, Carter Phillips, to "slow down from the rhetoric", as Phillips began his argument before the High Court on behalf of the State of California in the Schwarznegger -v- Plata  prison overcrowding case.Justice Sotomayor also had a series of hard questions for California's appellate attorney such as how his client could possibly… [read post]
13 May 2017, 8:51 am by Quinta Jurecic
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit heard oral argument in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm by Guest Blogger
The Court largely endorsed that logic two terms back in Harris v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 2:37 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Against the background of recent investment disputes (Philip Morris v Uruguay and Philip Morris v Australia) and recent trade agreements with ISDS norms (the United States – Mexico – Canada Agreement, USMCA, and the EU/Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, CETA), this chapter addresses the impact of ISDS on public health regulation.In Chapter 7, the author discusses how the US shaped the provisions on geographical indications in TPP-11. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:11 am by SHG
Jamison Koehler puts it succinctly: Brady v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 8:24 pm
  The case of Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 6:58 am by Lyle Denniston
When the Ninth Circuit panel in January declared the new standard for sexual orientation claims, it found that such a standard was necessary from a between-the-lines reading of the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:05 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Nope, the Ninth Circuit has stayed issuance of the mandate while it ponders nexus issues in another case.In June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously found that the Ninth had abused its discretion in a similar case, Ryan v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 7:04 am by Graham Smith
For an ecommerce lawyer who spent far too many hours at the turn of the millennium pondering how writing and signature requirements could be complied with electronically, reading the CJEU decision in El Majdoub v CarsOnTheWeb (C‑322/14, 21 May 2015) is something of a throwback. [read post]