Search for: "Powell v. Doe"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,038
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2016, 12:17 pm
In Habeas Corpus Resource Center v. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 10:49 am
See also Bakke, supra, at 312, 313 (opinion of Powell, J.). [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:37 am
As we all know s.89, Housing Act 1980, cannot be read in any other way (see Powell at [62]), but is, in the context of possession hearings, compatible with Article 8 (Powell, at [64]).If s.89, can’t be read down, then the county court is going to be unable to consider an Article 8 defence at the warrant stage (six weeks will already have expired or if there is time left unlikely to be long enough). [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:37 am
As we all know s.89, Housing Act 1980, cannot be read in any other way (see Powell at [62]), but is, in the context of possession hearings, compatible with Article 8 (Powell, at [64]).If s.89, can’t be read down, then the county court is going to be unable to consider an Article 8 defence at the warrant stage (six weeks will already have expired or if there is time left unlikely to be long enough). [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 5:52 pm
Powell, Sandra K. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 4:05 am
Shartel was writing a couple of years even before Buck v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:13 am
Powell, 99 Fla. 782, 794, 128 So. 258, 263 (1930). [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:36 am
In Abood v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
And that hypothetical Supreme Court was exactly what we had when Justice Powell was replaced by Justice Kennedy. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:29 am
Judge Michael Powell dissented. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 5:30 am
In Zurcher v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:44 am
U.S., 413 U.S. 266, 279 (1973) (Powell, J., concurring), and that individuals have a diminished expectation of privacy in their car, U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 9:45 am
Powell, and the court finds the state court determination reasonable. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:53 am
Carr or Plyler v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 2:35 am
Mason v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:20 pm
Although the charge against the victim was adjourned in contemplation of dismissal prior to the commencement of defendant's trial, that does not constitute a dismissal on the merits, and it therefore does not "negate the elements of good faith and [basis in fact]" (id.). [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 4:35 pm
Powell, Jr. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
In Kokesh v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
Even since McCann v. [read post]
