Search for: "Powers v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 37,163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2024, 2:00 am by Paul Caron
Conor Clarke (Washington University; Google Scholar), Moore: The Overlooked Excise Power, 181 Tax Notes Fed. 1759 (Dec. 4, 2023): Moore v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:47 am
  On those questions, the Court certainly has the power to say, in the words of Marbury v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 3:56 am by sally
Lamichhane v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 260; [2012] WLR (D) 67 “The Secretary of State had discretionary power to serve a notice under section 120 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 although failure to serve did not render an immigration decision unlawful.” WLR Daily, 7th March 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:45 pm by Karen Gullo
Power Ventures, set for 9:30 am on Dec. 9 before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, California. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:39 am by Lawrence Solum
Humphreys School of Law) has posted The Great and Powerful Oz Revealed: The Ethics and Wisdom of the Scotus Leaks in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:19 am by Shari Shapiro
Assuming that the northeastern states support the Clean Power Plan, it sets up a sort of "Blue v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 12:29 pm by Federalist Society
This case presents two questions regarding the power of bankruptcy courts: One, does Article III of the Constitution permit bankruptcy courts to exercise the judicial power of the United States on the basis of litigant consent--and if so, can consent be implied by litigant conduct? [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 12:29 pm by Federalist Society
This case presents two questions regarding the power of bankruptcy courts: One, does Article III of the Constitution permit bankruptcy courts to exercise the judicial power of the United States on the basis of litigant consent--and if so, can consent be implied by litigant conduct? [read post]
13 May 2016, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
The case (Power Places Tours Inc and others v Free Spirit and another) is unusual as one of the injunctions granted was to protect US residents from being harassed online by an individual, notwithstanding that they did not appear to have any special connection to the jurisdiction or to have suffered any detriment within it. [read post]