Search for: "Price v. Superior Court"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,080
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2025, 8:44 am
Intuit Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 2:02 pm
NetQuote, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:58 am
Waller v. [read post]
California Federal Court Allows Nationwide UCL Class Action in Pay-Per-Click Suit Against CitySearch
20 Nov 2009, 5:57 am
See Menagerie Productions v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 7:37 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 9:52 pm
Thus, the court denies the petition “on the narrow ground that the [petitioners] should have sought relief in the superior court first. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
To these Supreme Court cases, we append the more recent Superior Court case of Makripodis v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:02 am
Koh v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 6:44 pm
The superior court ruled in favor of the Department. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
It also comes with a price: there won't be any mention of Vioxx, or the specific facts the Operating Engineers case for the rest of this post. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 11:35 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), System Studies & Simulation, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 1:30 pm
O’Rourke v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 6:22 am
Supreme Court's decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 5:20 am
Finally, the district court refused to follow Valley Drug Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 6:32 am
Both sides had justifications why they should receive a premium to sell, including past expenditures of time and money and a claimed superiority in management ability, it was fairly clear was that the premium requested by each was the consideration for the emotional price of walking away. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:03 am
Gomez-Jimenez v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm
A North Carolina court held that physician reliance precluded warranty liability:Here the drug purchased by plaintiff was not available to the general public in the sense that it was available for purchase by any customer who came in the drug store, selected it from the shelf, and paid the price therefor. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 6:36 am
California Oak Foundation v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:59 am
”Unsurprisingly, the court also found superiority. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:14 am
Kurtz v. [read post]
