Search for: "Quality Courts United v. Quality Courts" Results 401 - 420 of 4,144
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 9:07 pm by Gene Takagi
There have been a few cases involving charities and purported support of terrorist organizations, including United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
The authors’ job is to make sense of the judicial reasoning and to unpick, for example, the madness of the majority theocratic US Supreme Court’s politicised and reactionary abominations, as in Roe v. [read post]
§ 2071, states that “Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office” commits a crime (emphasis added). [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 7:10 pm by Bill Marler
  PARTIES The amount in controversy is substantially far in excess of the jurisdictional minimum of this court (Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars–$25,000.00) or is otherwise within the jurisdiction of this Court. [read post]
  Rather than establishing a record of success, the primary effect has been to create uncertainty, as the agencies struggle with institutional constraints and have yet to achieve groundbreaking victories in court. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Indeed, increasingly what separates the very best law schools from the rest is less the quality and character of the faculty, and more the richness and depth of the student body from which each student can learn.6. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:37 am by Eugene Volokh
The cases described in the text involve courts passing judgment on communities within the United States, usually based on affidavits by litigants coupled with conve [read post]
” The court concluded that because the County was legally bound to approve 43 units pursuant to the stipulated judgments, that any alternative comprising fewer units would be “legally infeasible. [read post]