Search for: "Query v. United States"
Results 401 - 420
of 724
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2015, 2:49 pm
Paul (1969) held that this term includes “recreational areas” and not just places for spectators to watch events (as in the theaters, concert halls, and stadiums that are listed in the same subsection); United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:18 am
Solicitor General Don Verrilli, appearing on behalf of the United States to support the Project. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:30 pm
Whether the concept takes hold in the United States remains to be seen, especially with the tradition of robust First Amendment jurisprudence. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:30 pm
Whether the concept takes hold in the United States remains to be seen, especially with the tradition of robust First Amendment jurisprudence. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:30 pm
Whether the concept takes hold in the United States remains to be seen, especially with the tradition of robust First Amendment jurisprudence. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 2:51 pm
According to Sixth Circuit, the man-woman marriage laws in these states did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment—even in the wake of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 6:51 am
Deauville, LLC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
United Tactical Systems v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:00 pm
Aug. 13, 2010) The present posture of the case is that Ultramercial is again appealing from the decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:45 am
" in particular, applicant stated that its "handheld units store inside egg-shaped divider" and that "this device includes two hand-held, egg-shaped probes that are gently pressed to the skin. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 1:29 am
”John Thorpe MP put the State firmly ahead of the individual:“… In my view the State is in great danger, and no power which would tend to protect it should be withheld from the Government. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:50 pm
Citing the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
Klayman tells the panel that he doesn’t trust the United States’ explanation for his clie [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm
Today I attended the hour-long oral argument in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:24 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:37 am
Following the discussion about the utility of the Supreme Court stating a rule as to whether, and for how long, a car stop can be extended beyond its lawful justification, all of which arose out of the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Rodriguez v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 8:23 am
Let's send a message to Member States at the United Nations and wherever else folks are tackling surveillance law reform: surveillance law can no longer ignore our human rights. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:46 am
" United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
And the United States Supreme Court and courts of other states have treated the right as extending beyond firearms. [read post]
