Search for: "Quick v. United States"
Results 401 - 420
of 2,424
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
United States, vacated the decision of the Seventh Circuit, and remanded the case “for further consideration in light of the confession of error by the Solicitor General in his brief for the United States. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:55 am
In the opening brief in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:42 am
They could not remove speech glorifying terrorist attacks against the United States—unless they also remove speech decrying, memorializing, or educating about terrorist attacks against the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 8:03 pm
This is a quick follow-up to last week's post on an amicus curiae brief by Lawyers for Civil Justice:Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has granted an Apple motion for relief from a non-dispositive order by Magistrate Judge Nathaniel Cousins, who imposed sanctions on Apple for failure to timely provide documents sought by Qualcomm in its defense against the Federal Trade Commission's antitrust lawsuit. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 1:52 pm
As explained in the case of United Biscuits v Asda [1997] RPC 513, customers might be misled by the similarities of get-up, confusion has a broad interpretation and does not require an intention to deceive. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:08 pm
In a perfect world, the Supreme Court would have mailed courtesy copies of this decision to every criminal defense attorney in the United States firmly affixed to a very large bottle of J+B. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 3:09 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:42 am
On April 27, the Supreme Court agreed to take up United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm
The quick answer is that this doctrine was long abandoned in other states but survived in Pennsylvania until this century. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm
On June 26, 2013, when the Supreme Court decided the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 12:57 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:40 am
Caifornia and United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 1:50 pm
The judge held that the "combination of drugs" method: "resulted in arbitrary abrogation of a statutory and substantive right of a condemned person, in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Section 16, Article I of the Ohio Constitution (due process clause)" See State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:45 pm
Ct. 1061 (2016)Sturgeon v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:47 am
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the United States Supreme Court held that the NLRB needs at least three members to exercise its authority. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:37 pm
Just a quick comment: I do not believe that the following statement correctly reflects the opinion: "In District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 5:20 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
United States is a case originating near Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:55 am
But some quick Westlaw research kicked up a seemingly relevant case, which --oddly enough--also comes from Utah; namely, Utah Power & Light Co. v. [read post]
