Search for: "R. R. D. v. Holder" Results 401 - 420 of 903
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2009, 8:25 am
Supp. 1495, 1510 (E.D.N.Y. 1984), aff'd in part and rev'd in part, 786 F.2d 72 (2d Cir. 1986) (emphasis added). [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:01 am by structuredsettlements
Settlement Planning Issues for DiscussionThe either "72(m)(7) disabled" OR "substantially equal periodic payments" exception afforded to disabled IRA owners and qualified plan distributees  appears to apply to holders of modified endowment life insurance contracts  (see IRC 72(v)(2)(B)) and 72(v)(2)(C), but DOES NOT appear to apply to holders of annuities.IRC 72(u) imposes a similar 10% penalty tax on withdrawals from annuities prior… [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 11:21 am
PerfumeBay v. eBay trademark litigation - The blogging lawyers & attorneys at Sheppard Mullin in the firm's Fashion & Apparel Law Blog Establishing status as a top hat plan in the First Circuit - Massachusetts attorney Stephen D. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 11:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  R&D can provide push (demonstration and stimulus for market development with reduction of risk of market entry); pull mechanisms can assure scale for private R&D investments and decrease market risks through contractual mechanisms, including terms about ownership of IP or nonrestrictive licensing of IP. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Alpine Electronics of America (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: NPE patentee denied permanent injunction: LaserDynamics, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
Alpine Electronics of America (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: NPE patentee denied permanent injunction: LaserDynamics, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:42 pm by Joel Zand
View the class-action complaint against Facebook, adSage, and other defendants by Krystal’s NFL Shoppe here: Class Action Complaint (Inkies Sports, Inc. d/b/a Krystal’s NFL Shoppe v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube… [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
(IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Stay pending reexam denied because a stay would result in ‘more significant’ prejudice given the Court’s overall speed in disposing patent cases: Telecommunication Systems, Inc. v. [read post]