Search for: "R. R. D. v. Holder" Results 401 - 420 of 905
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2012, 11:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  R&D can provide push (demonstration and stimulus for market development with reduction of risk of market entry); pull mechanisms can assure scale for private R&D investments and decrease market risks through contractual mechanisms, including terms about ownership of IP or nonrestrictive licensing of IP. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
Gore & Assoc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court N D Ohio: False patent marking may not be false advertising: Rainworks Ltd v Mill-Rose Co (Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log) District Court S D New York: infringement of ‘essential’ patent in patent pool: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:23 am by Chantal DeSereville
In its reasoning the ERT adopted the interpretation of “taking” adopted by the Ontario Court of Justice in R. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 2:03 pm by Florian Mueller
This effort is orchestrated, not organic.Oracle's amici represent, among other things, a substantial percentage of software R&D, and include some of Oracle's fiercest competitors, while Google has not gathered support from any of its rivals.The signatories of the EFF's briefs don't have a comparably high share among computer scientists, software innovators, start-ups, and investors as Oracle's corporate amici have in the overall software market. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:01 am by structuredsettlements
Settlement Planning Issues for DiscussionThe either "72(m)(7) disabled" OR "substantially equal periodic payments" exception afforded to disabled IRA owners and qualified plan distributees  appears to apply to holders of modified endowment life insurance contracts  (see IRC 72(v)(2)(B)) and 72(v)(2)(C), but DOES NOT appear to apply to holders of annuities.IRC 72(u) imposes a similar 10% penalty tax on withdrawals from annuities prior… [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
ITC (ITC 337 Update) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Stay pending reissue: Timing and blog reliability: Tyco Fire Products v Victaulic (Patently-O) District Court E D Texas: Defense win on fringement & invalidity in Judge Davis’ court: Alcatel-Lucent v. [read post]