Search for: "REID v. Reid" Results 401 - 420 of 1,100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2023, 5:51 pm by INFORRM
General damages Whilst no case was identified to assist the Judge directly with the assessment of general damages, the Judge considered a number of authorities including MGN Limited v Representative Claimants [2015] EWCA Civ 1291, Reid v Price [2020] EWHC 594 (QB), Re TP (Kemp & Kemp, Vol 3 C2-002), ABC and WH v Willock [2015] EWHC 2687 (QB) and Bull v Desporte [2019] EWHC 1650 (QB) from which it is possible to draw the following guidance: The… [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:34 am
The US Court of Appeals aimed to answer this question in the case of Bikram Yoga College of India v Evolution Yoga, LLC, 2015 WL 5845415, as Jani explains in this post.* Reid Hoffman's networked future: all the world is one big LinkedInNeil reflects on hi-tech guru Reid Hoffman’s vision of a world that could be saved by networks.* The Lyrica patent dispute – part the first - validity* The Lyrica patent dispute – part the second -… [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:36 am by Kay Marbiah
  [1] Bloomberg LP v ZXC, [2022] UKSC 5, available here: https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2020-0122-judgment.pdf [2] Judgment, para 13 [3] Judgment, para 18 [4] Judgment, para 21 [5] Judgment, para 67 [6] Judgment, para 50 [7] Judgment, para 81 [8] Judgment, para 108 [9] Judgment, para 111 [10] Judgment, para 116 [11] Judgment, para 121 [12] Judgment, para 142 [13] Judgment, para 127 [14] Judgment, para 140 [15] Judgment, paras 154 and 155 [16]… [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 9:13 am by chief
The April edition of Legal Action brings news that Hurst v UK has settled. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 9:13 am by chief
The April edition of Legal Action brings news that Hurst v UK has settled. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 1:06 pm by Eric Sigda
Reid, 490 U.S. 730, 751-52 (1989). [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:53 am by JB
But not all reforms are made impossible; moreover, the most effective way to change individual constitutional doctrines is not Article V amendment. [read post]