Search for: "RIDER v. STATE"
Results 401 - 420
of 782
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2015, 5:44 am
Taxi Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 6:32 am
The court found that the relevant regulations regarding bus stops stated that in establishing a bus route, the primary consideration was the safety of the riders. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:31 am
Hollander v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 12:23 pm
By Jason Starling In what looks to be an ominous development for public-sector unions, the United States Supreme Court, on June 30, 2015, granted a petition for certiorari by the plaintiffs in Friedrichs v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
That is the key issue in the new case, Friedrichs v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 10:54 am
The California Court of Appeals recently rendered a decision in a case, Kaiser v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:05 pm
The department received 75 applications and selected 40 (including the sergeant), to participate in horse and rider evaluations. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
See Related Blog Posts: Nalwa v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 10:31 pm
Case Comment Cologna v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am
It named Lori and Joan as co-agents, and contained a major gifts rider, authorizing the agents to make gifts to themselves or others in any amount (see GOL §5-1514). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am
It named Lori and Joan as co-agents, and contained a major gifts rider, authorizing the agents to make gifts to themselves or others in any amount (see GOL §5-1514). [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:59 am
<> All Trails Day Unites Trail Enthusiasts - Snowmobilers, ORV Riders, Hikers, Bicyclists, Equestrians, and Water Trail enthusiasts will gather at the Michigan State Capitol on today to work on trail issues with each other and with their state lawmakers. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 7:27 am
In a critically important recent case, Sebago v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:43 am
The Court of Appeal overturned this decision, stating that the maps did conform with the law – but if that was not the case, the extent of any non-compliance could not be described as de minimus. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 6:35 am
The recent case of Towe v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 6:20 am
The plaintiff’s state law claims also failed (Goldberg v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 3:11 pm
This is because a bicycle is not considered a vehicle, as was established nearly twenty years ago in People v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 1:54 am
Here, in a nutshell, is what the Court said:Adequacy of Board of Appeal’s statement of reasons The General Court had no problem finding that the Board's statement of reasons was perfectly adequate, adding that the duty to state reasons for decisions is an essential procedural requirement, the reasoning of a decision consisting in a formal statement of the grounds on which that decision is based. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 3:11 pm
This is because a bicycle is not considered a vehicle, as was established nearly twenty years ago in People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 1:45 am
" But Google is pretty much isolated in the U.S. economy (with the greatest respect for the likes of Oracle foe HP and Java free-rider Red Hat). [read post]
