Search for: "ROBERTS V COMMERCE"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2016, 4:29 am
Robert Fortune and Chinese teaNeil shares the swashbuckling tale of Robert Fortune featuring adventure, disguise, both the modern versions of piracy - and all about tea.* How to Improve Patent Quality: Conference HighlightsMike Mireles brings us some of the best bits of the recent Santa Clara-Duke conference on Patent Quality. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 11:39 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in NFIB v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 12:04 am
After listening to the oral arguments in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 1:36 am
V. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:39 am
[Justice Gorsuch v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:49 am
” So said Chief Justice John Roberts when the U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 8:29 am
Seed Co. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:53 am
“Who, What and Wear of Dress Codes in the Workplace,” presented by Frank and Lisa V. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 10:04 pm
Palmer v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:41 am
The 3 Justices divide as follows: Roberts believes the statute valid under the taxing power (and doesn’t express any opinion about the commerce clause); Ginsburg believes the statute is valid under the commerce clause (and doesn’t express any opinion about the taxing power); Scalia believes neither the commerce nor the tax power encompasses the statute (because, say, it’s a regulation of inactivity and therefore beyond the commerce… [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:05 pm
, which is represented by Robert Bowie, Jr. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
(The defense team included lawyers from Jaburg & Wilk, Wilenchik & Bartness, and the Law Office of Robert W Shely). [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:12 am
He thus decided that it would simply be too damaging to the Court's credibility if there were a straight Republican/Democratic split on the Court, when confronted with the most politically salient case since Bush v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:15 am
White v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:02 pm
In Part III-A, Chief Justice Roberts said that the individual mandate was most naturally read as a command to buy insurance, which could not be sustained under either the Interstate Commerce Clause or the Necessary and Proper Clause. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Dent v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 10:07 am
As McCulloch v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 5:15 pm
In Texas v. [read post]
