Search for: "RULE REGARDING ATTORNEY S FEES"
Results 401 - 420
of 6,998
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2015, 4:48 pm
The complete FINRA release regarding the new rule may be found here. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 6:38 am
Rule 1.5(a)(1)-(8). [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 3:07 pm
§ 768.79 and Rule 1.442, is a defendant's offer of judgment valid if, in a case in which the plaintiff demands attorney's fees, the offer purports to satisfy all claims but fails to specify whether attorney's fees are included and fails to specify whether attorney's fees are part of the legal claim? [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:11 pm
Each week we receive calls from landlords and tenants who need a real estate attorney to advise them regarding residential security deposits. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:11 pm
Each week we receive calls from landlords and tenants who need a real estate attorney to advise them regarding residential security deposits. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:11 pm
Each week we receive calls from landlords and tenants who need a real estate attorney to advise them regarding residential security deposits. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:11 pm
Each week we receive calls from landlords and tenants who need a real estate attorney to advise them regarding residential security deposits. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
According to the Committee, Rule 1.5(a) of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct, prohibits attorneys from imposing "an excessive fee or expense" on a client. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:05 pm
The company filed an answer and counterclaim, and after acrimonious discovery and the whistleblower’s refusal to identify the specific provision of the False Claims Act she believed had been violated, the district court entered judgment on the pleadings for the company, regarding both her False Claims Act claims, and the company’s attorney fee demand. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 3:31 am
Department of Labor (DOL) fiduciary rule’s impact, even though full implementation has been delayed—extended to July 1, 2019. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 3:31 am
Department of Labor (DOL) fiduciary rule’s impact, even though full implementation has been delayed—extended to July 1, 2019. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:48 am
Last week in the US Court of Federal Claims, a ruling regarding the right of petitioners and their attorney's to utilize and compensate their structured settlement annuity broker was published by Special Master Christian Moran. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
In a five-page opinion regarding the denial of review that was joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh suggested that the New Jersey Supreme Court’s ruling was “in serious tension with” the U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 11:37 am
That’s because the circuit court ruling applied a risk, or contingency fee, multiplier of 1.75 to calculate The Paint Spot’s reasonable attorney rates, which amounted to approximately $284,000 prior to the appeal. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:40 pm
Under the pre-Brooks regime, there were about 62 % denials among the reported cases ruling on attorney’s fees. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:14 am
I had a few questions regarding my http://www.patentprophet.com web site regarding the New York ethics rules as to whether you can use a name other than your law firm name as your domain name, and whether you are able to advertise using the domain name in addition to your law firm name. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
The attorney would get the lion’s share ($2,900), while the rest would cover the trustee’s fees. [read post]
11 May 2023, 10:00 am
For all these reasons, the Federal Circuit affirmed the ruling of the district court that Pure Hemp was not entitled to attorney fees. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 2:16 pm
” With regard to attorneys’ fees, Director Cordray referenced the courts’ role in reviewing the reasonableness of attorney’s fees when approving class action settlements and indicated that the CFPB had not used data obtained in its arbitration study “to determine whether a certain percentage would be a reasonable amount to award to plaintiffs’ attorneys. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
” The Appellate Division has explained the reasoning behind this ruling by holding that “since the plaintiff’s counsel was precluded from seeking unpaid fees from the plaintiff, the plaintiff’s spouse may not be required to pay such fees. [read post]
