Search for: "Rather v. Rather" Results 401 - 420 of 76,606
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2015, 9:11 pm by Patricia Salkin
Murr v State of Wisconsin, 2014 WL 7271581 (WI App. 12/23/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/court-of-appeals/2014/2013ap002828.html Filed under: Current Caselaw, Takings [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 9:11 pm by Patricia Salkin
Murr v State of Wisconsin, 2014 WL 7271581 (WI App. 12/23/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/court-of-appeals/2014/2013ap002828.html Filed under: Current Caselaw, Takings [read post]
18 May 2021, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Maggie Blackhawk (University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School) has posted "On Power & the Law: McGirt v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 9:44 pm by Patent Docs
Patent and Trademark Office in implementing portions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act or 2012 violates the Constitution by permitting a non-Article III court to deprive patentees of property rights, in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:30 am by sally
RK (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 456; [2011] WLR (D) 147“There was no general rule to the effect that any returned asylum seeker who would be in a position to avoid risk of persecution only by falsely claiming to support the regime in his home country would be entitled to asylum; rather, it was necessary to make a close examination of the particular circumstances of the individual, as each case would turn on its own facts. [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:28 am by tracey
Regina (Nassery) v Brent London Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 539; [2011] WLR (D) 156  “Where a local authority was assessing whether a person was ‘in need of care and attention’ for the purposes of section 21(1)(a) of the National Assistance Act 1948 the primary focus was on present rather than future needs, but provided there was a present need for some sort of care an authority was also empowered to intervene before it became much worse. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:23 am by sally
When deciding these appeals the court had been sitting in the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, rather than the Court of Appeal, Civil Division.” WLR Daily, 4th July 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 1:50 am
 I would rather judges apply the law as they see it and save the sound bites for the elected branches. [read post]