Search for: "Reed v. Rule"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,928
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Derry v. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 4:59 am
In the case of Pickett v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:00 am
In the case of Ungurian v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 6:27 am
I figured there would be a more complete story later, and I was right.This story, by Steve Korris of Legal Newsline, talks about a ruling by Judge Coleman, the new judge in the fee dispute case that led to the alleged plot to bribe Judge Lackey, Jones, Funderburg v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 2:00 am
The decision of Brown v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of McDonald v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 4:59 pm
The ruling comes in Walnut Creek Police Officers’ Association v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:48 pm
Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc., a January 2008 case, the Court held that the Rule 18.6 applies even when the discovery at issue is being sought from a non-party. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 2:15 am
However, he relied on the well-established exception to that rule where the statute imposes an obligation for the benefit or protection of a particular class of individuals (per Lord Diplock in Lonrho v Shell Petroleum Co Ltd (No 2) [1982] AC 173.) [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 3:23 pm
Revising rules related to signature requirements for certain exceptions (e.g., special compensation). [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:36 am
Reed ruled that the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment prohibited discrimination on the basis of sex, and 1973, when the court in Frontiero v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 5:43 pm
The Supreme Court will hear the libel appeal in Serafin v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 2:01 pm
In Reed v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 7:36 am
Louisiana and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals heard another Texas case with deep racial undertones, that of Rodney Reed. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
See the Rule Capture explained (kind of)! [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 10:55 am
According to Steven Katz, partner at Reed Smith LLP, Gentry is one of the California Supreme Court's most erroneously-reasoned decisions in quite some time. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
Beck of the Philadelphia office of the Reed Smith law firm for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:10 pm
Now, today, we see the 7th Circuit couldn’t wait a couple months for the Supreme Court’s ruling in Christopher v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm
Reed Plaintiff Can't be Forced to Accept Defense Counsel's Facebook Friend Request in Personal Injury Case -- Piccolo v. [read post]
