Search for: "Rice v. Rice"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2009, 5:30 pm
Rice (08-1592). [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:30 pm
The challengers filed a cert petition (posted here), asking the Court to review this Question Presented: In Rice v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
Rice, a summary order decided on October 16. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 6:52 am
In this regard, the average consumer normally perceives a mark as a whole and does not proceed to analyze its various details (OHIM v Shaker, C‑334/05 P).In considering such distinctive and dominant elements, the Court noted that the figures in both marks are likely to represent strong or healthy people. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 8:38 am
Rice, 2018 U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 2:12 pm
Lauderdale, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:30 am
Liberties Union v New York City Police Dept., 32 NY3d 556). ** See Chapter 96 of the Laws of 2020. *** There are statutory prohibitions to public disclosure of certain public records. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:30 am
Liberties Union v New York City Police Dept., 32 NY3d 556). ** See Chapter 96 of the Laws of 2020. *** There are statutory prohibitions to public disclosure of certain public records. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:05 am
Lombardi, Reynolds Revisited: The Original Meaning of Reynolds v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:47 am
Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 11:35 am
No more guidance about Texas Rice Land Partners TEXAS RICE LAND PARTNERS, LTD. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
In the case of Maison v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 8:30 am
(Rice Univ., Oct. 2022) [text]Report of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants, UN Doc. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 11:56 am
The cases are Amgen V. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:31 am
But in New York v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 11:47 am
Rice, 995 F.2d 719, 722 (7th Cir. 1993). [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:07 pm
See Miller v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm
In Texas Rice Land Partners, LTD v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 12:46 pm
Rice. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 1:00 pm
Reasons for judgment were released yesterday by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry (Cabrera v. [read post]