Search for: "Robbins v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 493
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2010, 3:47 am by SHG
Already, the blawgosphere is atwitter over the class action filed in Robbins v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 11:33 am by Eugene Volokh
According to the Complaint in Robbins v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 12:01 pm
Henry Watkins Skinner alleges in his original complaint in Skinner v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 9:27 am by Steve Hall
  Maro Robbins' earlier coverage of habeas issues in the San Antonio Express-News is here and here.The Texas Defender Service report, Lethal Indifference: The Fatal Combination of Incompetent Attorneys and Unaccountable Courts, highlighted problems with the performance of attorneys appointed in the state habeas phase of post-conviction review of death sentences. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 4:27 am
In granting the motion, the court determined, inter alia, that defendants established as a matter of law that plaintiff is unable to prove that defendants' [*2]negligence is a proximate cause of plaintiff's damages (see Robbins v Harris Beach & Wilcox, 291 AD2d 797, 798). [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 10:43 pm
Just found them via Google Alerts and only have had time to read FLIR Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:59 am
But just as a State may not deny rights protected under the Federal Constitution through pretextual procedural rulings, see NAACP v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
(The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office practice regarding legal expenses in oppositions (The IP Factor)   New Zealand New Zealand launches second ACTA consultation (Michael Geist)   United Kingdom EWHC request for summary judgment denied - OHIM-IPO class heading conflict case: Daimler v Sany (IPKat)   United States US General Trade secret litigation on the rise against laid off employees (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) Seeking and justifying attorney… [read post]
1 May 2009, 9:33 am
Robbins, 752 F.2d 1170, 1180 (7th Cir. 1985) (declaring it "extremely unlikely that Congress would have wanted ERISA fiduciaries to be subject to the vagaries of state contribution law"). [read post]