Search for: "Rodgers v. Rodgers"
Results 401 - 420
of 480
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2010, 10:07 pm
However – particularly in the absence of any media arguments to the contrary – Lord Rodgers was at pains to emphasise that the judgment should not be regarded as laying down any general rule as to the way that applications for anonymity orders should be determined in control order cases. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:26 pm
This issue arose in Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (2010) EWHC 865 (QB). [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm
in the Article 10 cases of Chauvy v France ((2005) 41 EHRR 610 at [70]), Radio France v France ((2005) 40 EHRR 29, [31]) and Cump? [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:07 am
Raman Foundry, AIR 1974 SC 1265, overruled in Kamaluddin Ansari v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:11 am
Lord Rodger and Sir John Dyson SCJ delivered concurring judgments. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:30 pm
The following essay for our thirty-day series on John Paul Stevens is by Rodger D. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm
Prisoners (as in Keenan v United Kingdom (2001) 33 EHRR 913),conscripts (Álvarez Ramón v Spain (application no 51192/99) 3 July 2001) and mental patients (Herczegfalvy v Austria (1992) 15 EHRR 437) are in a different position because the deprivation of liberty imparts more responsibility on the authorities concerned to ensure that any consequent suicidal ideation is properly dealt with. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:52 am
The Supreme Court has, belatedly, posted the “Case Details” for this case, which show that the proposed bench for the hearing is Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown, with Sir John Dyson as the fifth member of the court. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:58 pm
Hughes v Borodex Ltd. [2010] EWCA Civ 425 This was the Court of Appeal hearing of the appeal from the High Court decision on first appeal that we reported in March 2009. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:58 pm
Hughes v Borodex Ltd. [2010] EWCA Civ 425 This was the Court of Appeal hearing of the appeal from the High Court decision on first appeal that we reported in March 2009. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:14 pm
Lord Rodger thought otherwise: ‘Doubtless, some may indeed draw the unjustified inference that M fears. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 11:33 am
Lord Rodger illustrated the principle in Rahman [2008] HL: “Suppose that, knowing what A is like and that he tends to carry a gun, B contemplates that A may take a gun and use it in the course of the attack on the victim. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 3:49 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 12:30 pm
Oral Argument in case# 09-3364; USA v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 8:01 am
Those papers should be unsealed about 10 days after each filing.Here's what I believe is a full list of the plaintiffs in this case:The Music Force LLCCal IV Entertainment, LLCCherry Lane Music Publishing Company, Inc.The Football Association Premier League LimitedRobert TurNational Music Publishers' AssociationThe Rodgers & Hammerstein OrganizationEdward B. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
Norris v United States [2010] UKSC 9 SC (Lord Phillips, Lord Hope, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Judge, Lord Collins, Lord Kerr) 24 February 2010 In determining whether interference with an individual’s right to a family life was justified to achieve the aim of extradition, the court should not consider whether the circumstances were exceptional but should consider whether the consequences were exceptionally serious SUMMARY The appellant had recently… [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 4:10 am
Rodgers sustained before the bus accident. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 10:30 pm
Rodgers, 2010 Ore. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 6:11 am
So said the 7th Circuit in Rodgers v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:12 pm
(See Gibson v. [read post]
