Search for: "Rosen v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2009, 8:15 pm
Much of the discussion is centering on the impact of the 2005 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 7:08 am
Likewise, the parties have also requested a three-month stay in connection with the deadline for dispositive motion (CFTC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 5:25 pm
Among other things, Conway briefed and argued (and won) Morrison v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
Rosen, No. 3303 EDA 2014, 2016 Pa. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 9:30 pm
DRE Brad Snyder discusses his book, Democratic Justice: Felix Frankfurter, the Supreme Court, and the Making of the Liberal Establishment, with Jeffrey Rosen at the New-York Historical Society on Tuesday, December 12, 6:30 – 7:30 pm ET. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:51 am
Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 3:00 am
Rosen For Movant: Rhonda M. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 12:25 pm
On November 3, 2010, in Airgas, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:20 am
It is incumbent upon the plaintiff to present expert testimony to support allegations of malpractice (see 530 E. 89 Corp. v Unger, 43 NY2d 776, 777; McDermott v Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hosp., 15 NY2d 20, 24), except where the alleged act of malpractice falls within the competence of a lay jury to evaluate (see 530 E. 89 Corp. v Unger, 43 NY2d at 777; Hammer v Rosen, 7 NY2d 376, 380). [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 6:24 am
Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
Today in the Community we are discussing Arizona v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:16 pm
The week wraps up with continuing coverage of this week’s decisions in Brown v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:35 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 1:30 am
Rosen U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:32 pm
”[16] The Decision in Martoma In United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 2:31 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Request for Leave to Appeal as Pauper Denied; Appeal Deemed Not Being Taken in Good Faith United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 8:34 am
As he put it in a concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am
United States, which asks whether stock options are taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, and Chavez-Meza v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:09 pm
” Rosen expected the former because “when . . . [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am
You surely recall the Hassell v. [read post]
