Search for: "Rosen v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 844
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2017, 6:10 am
Posted by William Magnuson, Texas A&M Law School, on Wednesday, September 13, 2017 Tags: Algorithmic trading, Banks, Bitcoin, Crowdfunding, Dodd-Frank Act, Financial crisis, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Financial reporting, Financial technology, Innovation, International governance, Market efficiency, Moral hazard, SIFIs, Systemic risk OCC Stakes Out a Lead Role in Establishing New… [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 9:05 am by Eric Goldman
Canning * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts State Law Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices–Amaretto v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 9:55 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
State, No. 112,131 (Lyon)K.S.A. 60-1507 appeal (petition for review)Kristin Patty[Affirmed; Luckert; January 19, 2018]Whether defendant "in custody" when released from probationIneffective assistance of postconviction counselState v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 10:40 am by NCC Staff
United States is expected to be one of the biggest decisions of the upcoming term, Rosen said. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” At The National Conference of State Legislatures blog, Lisa Soronen notes that in Hernandez v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
  As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2017, 5:23 am by Matthew Kahn
Covering travel ban litigation, Jane summarized the oral arguments in Hawaii v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:25 pm by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Hawaii v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:02 am by David Kris
California, which required a warrant to search a smart phone incident to an arrest; and second, the concurrences of five Justices in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 8:16 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Goering and State Board of Indigent Defense Services, No. 116,447 (Sedgwick)Original action (mandamus)Sarah Swain[Petition granted in part; Luckert; July 21, 2017]Whether district court had to hold hearing on whether defendant unable to obtain necessary defense servicesState v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 3:12 pm by Barry Rosen
The United States Supreme Court barred federal courthouse doors to a wide swath of lawsuits complaining about intangible or ephemeral injuries in its May 2016 decision in Spokeo v. [read post]