Search for: "S S V STATE OF MICHIGAN"
Results 401 - 420
of 6,425
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2008, 4:43 am
The Michigan Supreme Court finally came down with their opinion in National Pride at Work v Governor of Michigan. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 1:45 pm
On July 13, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued an order in Beattie v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 2:58 pm
In Bogle v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
The other was uploaded to the Michigan State Police data base. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:03 am
In this high interest case involving many states and trade associations including Michigan, parties challenge EPA's "total maximum daily load" (TMDL) of nitrogen, phosphorous, and sediment that can be released into the Chesapeake Bay. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 7:38 am
In 2009, the court held in Teal v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:01 pm
The US District Court for the Eastern District of New York has denied Salem Alshdaifat's request to move the trial from the Empire State to his home state of Michigan. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 2:00 am
Reuven S. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:44 pm
The Supreme Court in Michigan v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 5:05 am
Everyone’s got a litigation strategy, I guess. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:57 am
The Michigan Secretary of State will also now maintain records of drunk driving convictions for the life of the driver. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:24 pm
Ben Cohen (The Charles Hamilton Houston Institute for Race and Justice and The Justice Center's Capital Appeals Project) have posted Redemption Song: Graham v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 11:42 am
In State of Michigan v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:27 pm
& Guaranty Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2009, 10:31 am
News America Marketing trial currently being conducted in Michigan state court, reports BNET.Over News America's objection, Judge Sapala ruled that the videotaped deposition testimony would be allowed into the trial. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 8:59 am
The prosecution based its case on a prior Michigan ruling, People v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:09 am
” It’s not because a state Supreme Court ordered it, but because it has evolved into standard use. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:09 am
In this week’s decision, City of Pontiac Retired Employees Ass’n v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 4:33 am
In People v Golba, the Court of Appeals stated that this language was holding. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:11 am
Blouir In last week’s Michigan Supreme Court order Wiedyk v. [read post]
