Search for: "S. R.C. T." Results 401 - 420 of 520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2012, 7:49 pm by Eric
Therefore, we find that there was insufficient evidence that Gordon's use of the Village's computers for personal purposes constituted Theft in Office pursuant to R.C. 2921.41 * Woodward v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:15 am by MBettman
Pertinent to this appeal is Hoyle’s claim brought pursuant to R.C. 2745.01(C), the section of the intentional tort statute dealing with deliberate removal of an equipment safety guard. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 8:16 am by MBettman
And it isn’t even up to this judge to determine the amount, should Doss prevail. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
boil•er•plate (boi l r-pl t ) n. 1. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:41 am by Russ Bensing
  Manus’ case was made easier by the fact that the offenses clearly should have merged, but that’s not dispositive:  even if the offenses weren’t allied, a defendant could argue that his plea wasn’t knowing and intelligent because he wasn’t told that. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 3:47 am
Still, the tension caused by Heller’s basic holding and the opinion’s dicta about felon-in-possession laws isn’t going away. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:49 pm
Undoubtedly, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Heller, “[t]he Second Amendment … is now clearly an important individual right, which should not be given short shrift. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:12 pm
 See R.C. 4113.62(C)(1), declaring any provision of a construction agreement “that waives or precludes liability for delay...when the cause of the delay is a proximate result of the owner’s act or failure to act, or that waives any other remedy...when the cause of the delay is a proximate result of the owner’s act or failure to act, is void and unenforceable as against public policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 3:29 am
The SB 2 sentencing reforms weren’t any great shakes, but I don’t know anybody who doesn’t think that, post-Foster, Ohio’s sentencing scheme is a disaster. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:07 am by MBettman
R.C. 2903.01(B) (No person shall purposely cause the death of another . . . after committing or attempting to commit… rape…) R.C. 2929.03(D)(3) (If, after receiving the trial jury’s recommendation that the sentence of death be imposed, the court finds, by proof beyond a reasonable doubt…that the aggravating circumstances the offender was found guilty of committing outweigh the mitigating factors, it shall impose the sentence of death on the… [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:22 am by Colin Miller
” The trial court disagreed, concluding that evidence of the incident was inadmissible under Ohio’s rape shield rule, R.C. 2907.05(E), which provides in relevant part that Evidence of specific instances of the victim’s sexual activity, opinion evidence of the victim’s sexual activity, and reputation evidence of the victim’s sexual activity shall not be admitted under this section unless it involves evidence of… [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:19 am by michael
  Thus these assets aren’t governed by 2117.06. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 8:29 am
Binns (1988), 35 Ohio St.3d 176.While Ohio’s Seller Disclosure Act (R.C. 5302.30; the “Disclosure Act”) still requires sellers of most types of residential property to disclose known defects, the Disclosure Act does not directly modify the doctrine of caveat emptor by creating a new statutory fraud claim or by eliminating existing common law claims. [read post]