Search for: "S. R.C. T."
Results 401 - 420
of 520
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2012, 10:19 am
The trial court awarded damages of $800 to the tenants due to the landlord’s terminating the water in breach of R.C. 5321.15. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:38 am
It’s what happens to most people. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:07 am
” … Alexander cited R.C. 1702.80(D) in support of his public policy argument. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm
D.H. (2009), wrote that ”(t)he disposition of a child is so different from the sentencing of an adult that fundamental fairness to the child demands the unique expertise of a juvenile judge. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:57 am
It starts with the conclusion that “an indictment is defective if it alleges violations of R.C. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:42 am
But since Andy’s the boss, Dwight couldn’t override him. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:27 am
I don’t buy that; as Grace notes, the whole purpose of the requirement for giving reasons is that without it, there’s no opportunity for meaningful judicial review of a sentence. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:11 pm
Cropper t/a R.C. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 7:49 pm
Therefore, we find that there was insufficient evidence that Gordon's use of the Village's computers for personal purposes constituted Theft in Office pursuant to R.C. 2921.41 * Woodward v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
Tal cuestión debe ser abordada recordando (por todas, sentencia de 13 de julio de 2011 -R.C. nº 4964 / 2007- F.D. 5º-) que los límites susceptibles de control jurisdiccional que la jurisprudencia tradicional declaró respecto de la llamada discrecionalidad técnica fueron estos: los elementos reglados, los hechos determinantes y los principios generales del derecho; y subrayando también que la más reciente doctrina de esta… [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:32 pm
R.C. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:52 pm
R.C. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:28 am
Gallagher’s probably right that some elucidation of Johnson is in order, but I don’t think that’s imminent; I haven’t seen the kinds of conflicts or weird decisions that would attract the Supreme Court’s attention. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:06 am
” Well, guys, Baker didn’t “imply” it, and it wasn’t “interpeted” to mean that; it flat out said it: We answer the certified question by holding that the judgment of conviction is a single document that need not necessarily include the plea entered at arraignment, but that it must include the sentence and the means of conviction, whether by plea, verdict, or finding by the court, to be a final appealable order under… [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:22 am
” The trial court disagreed, concluding that evidence of the incident was inadmissible under Ohio’s rape shield rule, R.C. 2907.05(E), which provides in relevant part that Evidence of specific instances of the victim’s sexual activity, opinion evidence of the victim’s sexual activity, and reputation evidence of the victim’s sexual activity shall not be admitted under this section unless it involves evidence of… [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:39 pm
They threatened a lawsuit against Calipari, Rose and U of M athletic director R.C. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 3:38 am
Of course, you don’t need one for self-defense; if you reasonably believe there’s a gun, that’s just as good. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:37 am
Gonzalez, doesn’t think so, noting that “the Ohio Supreme Court has not held that a judgment of conviction is rendered void by the imposition of multiple sentences in violation of R.C. 2941.25? [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:44 am
Warner learns one of life’s invaluable lessons: just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:45 am
There’s an old saying that money isn’t worth your life, and Marcell Bell should’ve heeded it. [read post]
