Search for: "SEALED APPELLANT 1"
Results 401 - 420
of 680
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2010, 6:55 am
(See also Appellants’ Motion to Enlarge Appellate Record with Evidence Concealed from the District Court.) [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 8:02 am
Videos of jury deliberations could be sealed and preserved for viewing by researchers only after the case is final. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
This gives us the opportunity to understand how many sealed requests the government is making and ask for other documents to be unsealed. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 6:28 am
Hearst Corp. (2d Cir. 2015) described the law, in a similar case: Plaintiff-Appellant Lorraine Martin was arrested in 2010. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 4:47 pm
§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A). [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:04 pm
Judge Sands immediately sealed the proceedings as well as filings related to the allegations and held two hearings. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:39 pm
Circuit back on October 20th, and it occurred to me that two further problematic DOJ arguments are also worth flagging.1. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:12 am
The answers to Question #’s 1 and 2 are “Yes” and “No,” respectively. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 11:20 pm
Here are the Provisions: Increases the term of office for any of the following Justices and judges to eight years, for any term beginning on or after January 1, 2013: – Justices of the Supreme Court; – Appellate court judges; and – Superior court judges. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 9:22 am
Sigler, 967 So. 2d 835, 845 (Fla. 2007), which held Florida Statutes section 924.34 (2001) unconstitutional 'to the extent that it can be read to allow the appellate court to direct entry of judgment for a lesser-included offense when all of the elements of the lesser-included offense have not been found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.' " California Appellate Districts, March 06, 2008 Cal. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Carlton, No. 07-2344 A district judge is not required by 28 U.S.C. sections 455(a) or (b)(1) to recuse himself from presiding over a criminal trial merely because he previously determined that a defendant was guilty of the same conduct in a parole revocation hearing. . [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 8:48 am
Two common questions I hear from potential clients, as well as the general public, are (1) are the courts open and (2) can people even file new matters (divorce, enforcement, modification, etc.) [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:33 am
Flower, No. 1 CA-CV 06-0781 (Ariz. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:33 am
Flower, No. 1 CA-CV 06-0781 (Ariz. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:16 am
As to the first issue, the judge noted that Rule 41(b)(1) “allows a . . . [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The court further observed that plain error review is not available for discretionary decisions of the trial court, and the case “did not remotely approach” the circumstances where invocation of Rule 2 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure was warranted to obtain review. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
This Form displays under “1. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 12:28 pm
§ 3553(b)(1), which required the court to sentence within the guideline range, and 18 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 5:53 am
The case was argued before the New York Appellate Division, First Department. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 12:36 am
However, state courts may need a bit more persuading, Appellate litigator Howard J. [read post]
