Search for: "SHAW V. STATE" Results 401 - 420 of 1,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2008, 1:37 pm
The Court of Appeals decision yesterday (Thursday) in the case of Board of Commissioners of LaPorte County, Board of Commissioners of Porter County, Town of Beverly Shores, et al v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:09 pm by Christopher Danzig
[New York Times] * Lat discusses blogging v. journalism, why you shouldn't be stupid, and the state of legal education with UVA School of Law. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:32 pm by Anita Earls
The biggest elephant in the room here is the fact that the 2016 congressional redistricting plan enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly as a remedy for the Shaw v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 10:44 am by David M. McLain
At the beginning of September 2016, the Colorado Court of Appeals again weighed in on the definition of “substantial completion” for work completed by subcontractors and design professionals in Sierra Pacific Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 10:44 am by David M. McLain
At the beginning of September 2016, the Colorado Court of Appeals again weighed in on the definition of “substantial completion” for work completed by subcontractors and design professionals in Sierra Pacific Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:48 pm by Mary Whisner
")The State of Abortion LawsAn Overview of Abortion Laws, Guttmacher Inst. [read post]
United States limiting claims that can be brought under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act Takeaways from the December 2021 DOJ and FTC Virtual Public Workshop discussing efforts to promote competitive labor markets and worker mobility Best practices for updating and structuring agreements and policies to adequately protect company assets and trade secrets, including addressing the challenge for multi-state employers of an increasing divergence of state laws and remote… [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am by Maureen Johnston
Shaw 13-897Issue: Whether, in a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice relating to that omission under the standards of Strickland v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:18 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Authored by Seyfarth Shaw LLPBy Andrew McNaught Readers will recall that we recently corralled the law on “Assistive Animals” in the workplace, here. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
At Reason (via How Appealing), Damon Root looks at the federal government’s cert petition in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 5:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Hat-tip to Josh Salinas at Seyfarth Shaw for his fine analysis of new Oklahoma legislation that chips away at some prohibitions on restrictive covenants.Oklahoma is one of three red-flag states that generally prohibit non-competition agreements. [read post]