Search for: "SHORT v. STATE"
Results 401 - 420
of 22,674
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2006, 7:47 am
I have argued in an earlier post that the secrecy of information relevant to a civil or criminal court case creates serious problems under Article 6 ECHR and/or Article 14 ICCPR, but that it could potentially be justified if all possible steps short of disclosure are taken in order to alleviate the consequences for any trial of – reasonably ordered – classifications of information.I return to this because the English Court of Appeal has yesterday (again) spoken on the issue,… [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 8:36 am
YouTube is not a state actor (cite to PragerU v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
For seventy years, Rule 8 has stated that any complaint "must contain . . . a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:22 am
Serrano et al v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 1:58 pm
Asbill On July 9th, 2020, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in McGirt v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 2:09 pm
Supreme Court's retroactivity analysis as stated in Teague v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 9:46 am
The conversation became serious because Haley stated he was tired of hiding in Singer's closet, literally, whenever his son and neighbors came by, and an argument ensued. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 3:06 pm
United States: Sentence reduction due to retroactive amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines17-312 United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 12:32 pm
Smart v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
In Arizona v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:22 am
Nagle v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:27 am
The FAA was enacted in the 1920’s before the landmark federalism case of Erie v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:08 am
The Harris v. [read post]
14 Mar 2006, 1:44 pm
The United States Sentencing Commission has released a Report on the Impact of United States v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
After analysing Dereci he found that the CJEU did not accept that an impediment of the right short of denial might be covered by the scope of the principle and instead found that jeopardy caused to family life or any adverse economic impact on the family do not suffice. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:21 pm
Bickham v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am
A short explanation of relists is available here. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 9:51 pm
If so, that’s only because memories are short. [read post]
