Search for: "SMALL v GOOD"
Results 401 - 420
of 8,361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2013, 1:18 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:36 pm
Law watched Trapp exit the taxi carrying `a small little bag . . . almost like a shopping bag. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 2:09 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 6:17 pm
That said, I am still reading court cases.I'm going to make short work of Spring Creative Products Group v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 9:16 am
See Power Press Sales Co v MSI Battle Creek Stamping, 238 Mich App 173, 183, 604 NW2d 772 (1999). [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 9:16 am
See Power Press Sales Co v MSI Battle Creek Stamping, 238 Mich App 173, 183, 604 NW2d 772 (1999). [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:29 pm
Jones v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 6:56 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
In the recent Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas decision in the case of Kromferd v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:07 pm
In Abood v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 4:51 pm
Subway's recent Michael Phelps ad would be a good example. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 6:11 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 5:00 am
Given that the campaign is focused (as always) on a relatively small group of issues, tech policy watchers who spoke to Ars were surprised to see a presidential platform that mentions IP issues at all. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Paris v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:39 am
This case is a good cautionary tale of how a descriptive trademark can be turned into an unduly powerful weapon that ultimately hurts consumers. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:30 am
DatabaseLLC * Damages from Competitive Keyword Advertising Are “Vanishingly Small” * More Defendants Win Keyword Advertising Lawsuits * Another Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Fails Badly * Duplicitous Competitive Keyword Advertising Lawsuits–Fareportal v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
Nick Bagley has a pair of good posts about this. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 2:55 pm
The appellate opinion, Easley v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:46 am
We found a good boiled-down explication of the ruling over at The Atlantic's Web site. [read post]
