Search for: "SMITH v. MARTIN" Results 401 - 420 of 573
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
’  We had posts about this by Steve Barnett and Martin Moore. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Publication: LSE MediaPolicy Brief 7, Regulating Media Plurality and Media Power in the 21st Century, [PDF], Rachael Craufurd Smith, Damian Tambini and Davide Morisi. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 11 December 2019 Julian Knowles J handed down judgment in the case Kirkegaard v Smith  [2019] EWHC 3393 (QB). [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm by John Steele
Although it’s not an IAC case, the SCOTUS also issued Smith v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 5:33 am by Tessa Shepperson
My HMO series with David looks at the Management Regulations, and the case of Spencer v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Meanwhile Roy Greenslade suggested that Lord Chris Smith – a member of the IPSO “Foundation Group” – is a “shoo-in” as its chair. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
In Martin v Najem [2022] NSWDC 479, the claimant, an Instagram food blogger, was called a paedophile and racist in a video posted by a fellow social media foodie as part of a wider campaign of abuse. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am by The Charge
  Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation Roy Greenslade reports on a British Medical Journal blog by Martin McKee, professor of European public health at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, that argues that trying to maintain an objective stance in journalism can mislead audiences. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
” In the case of Accommodation Pty Ltd v Aikman [2017] WASC 157, Kenneth Martin J dismissed an action for libel. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Issue: Whether, under Seminole Tribe v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by INFORRM
In the Courts On 15 March 2012 partial permission to appeal was given by Dame Janet Smith in the case of Waterson v Lloyds. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Martin, No. 06-5605 A conviction and sentence for drug- and firearm-related offenses is affirmed primarily where the district court's permitting a police officer to testify as both an expert and a fact witness, without the issuance of a cautionary instruction to the jury, did not constitute reversible error under US v. [read post]