Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF B. J. and J. J." Results 401 - 420 of 4,643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2010, 6:00 am by Kara OBrien
UK branches of firms whose home state is within the EEA are not required to apply the Code as their home state will be required to apply equivalent provisions under CRD3. [read post]
8 May 2016, 9:01 pm
J) With regard to entrepreneurial skills education requirements for professional graduate degree programs at state institutions of higher education. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 5:43 pm by INFORRM
Section 4: Public Interest Jay J found that the defence of ‘public interest’ under section 4 of the 2013 Act was made out in respect of all of the allegations. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
” Scene 2: The proclamation creates exceptions to the entry bans based on  the national interests of the United States (among other grounds). [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
” Scene 2: The proclamation creates exceptions to the entry bans based on  the national interests of the United States (among other grounds). [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 12:21 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; Naomi B. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 1:52 am by 1 Crown Office Row
R (T) v (1) Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, (2) Secretary of State for the Home Department (Secretary of State for Justice an interested party) [2012] EWHC 147 (Admin) – read judgment. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:52 am by Alex Gasser
  The notice further states that the Commission is particularly interested in responses to the following questions: 1. [read post]