Search for: "STATE v BARTLETT" Results 401 - 420 of 495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 6:07 am by Bexis
  It's basically the same point we made over two years ago with our own state-by-state list, here. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, April 8, 2024 Tags: corporate boards, corporate law, directors, Fiduciary duties, Shareholder value, Stakeholders Delaware Supreme Court Holds Entire Fairness Applicable to All Conflicted Controller Transactions Posted by Gregory V. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, April 8, 2024 Tags: corporate boards, corporate law, directors, Fiduciary duties, Shareholder value, Stakeholders Delaware Supreme Court Holds Entire Fairness Applicable to All Conflicted Controller Transactions Posted by Gregory V. [read post]
8 Dec 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
March 28, 2024. [4] 4 Statement of Interest of the United States at 3, Cornish-Adebiyi v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 1:31 pm by Amy Howe
The state appealed to the Supreme Court, which announced in January that it would review the case, Lamone v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 2:02 pm
  The court only needed to consider three cases to determine that preemption did not bar plaintiffs’ claim:  Levine, Maya v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 6:06 am
Maldonado, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Tuesday, August 21, 2018 Tags: Board composition, Board turnover, Boards of Directors, Disclosure, Diversity, Engagement, Institutional Investors, Shareholder voting Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets Posted by Ruth V. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Youngwood, Nicholas Goldin, and Stephen Blake are Partners at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:45 am by Steve McConnell
But recently the Middle District of Tennessee rode to the rescue and delivered a useful opinion in a pain pump case, Rodriguez v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:36 am
For the liberal justices, I would call Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]