Search for: "STATE v BARTLETT"
Results 401 - 420
of 532
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2011, 7:07 am
On these matters, though, Bartlett's an apostate conservative. ** The dictum plays the role United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
Bartlett (1984), courts are limited to the statutory text, legislative history, and views of the Executive Branch or can instead also consider other external indicia; and (2) whether the lower court properly ruled that a Native American tribe's reservation had been "disestablished. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:51 am
In Speert v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 1:27 pm
Title: Kingdom of Spain v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
State, 686 S.E.2d 483, 485-86 (Ga. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:36 am
However, even if a plaintiff establishes the first prong, the plaintiff must still demonstrate that he or she would have succeeded on the merits of the action but for the attorney's negligence (see Hamoudeh v Mandel, 62 AD3d 948, 949; McCluskey v Gabor & Gabor, 61 AD3d 646, 648; Peak v Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P.C., 28 AD3d 1028, 1030-31; see also Brodeur v Hayes, 18 AD3d 979; Raphael v Clune, White & Nelson, 201 AD2d… [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:05 am
Bartlett and others v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Case (C-537/09); [2011] WLR (D) 158 “The mobility component of disability living allowance constituted a special non-contributory benefit within the meaning of article 4(2a) of and Annex IIa to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 and Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 631/2005, and of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 as amended by Parliament and… [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Katz, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles 6 $257,679,500 Consumer Protection State of Louisiana v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
Again, this opinion is valid only for the State of Massachusetts and not Utah. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 12:34 pm
This follows the recent decision of King v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 7:34 am
This follows the recent decision of King v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
: cultural, legal and philosophical challenges / Anine Kierulf & Helge Rønning (eds.).Göteborg, Sweden: Nordicom, [2009] Gaming LawKF8210.G35 U53 2010Understanding gaming law issues : leading lawyers on understanding recent changes in state and tribal gambling, handling economic and regulatory pressures, and anticipating future legal trends. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:33 pm
overview here of King v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:07 am
It's basically the same point we made over two years ago with our own state-by-state list, here. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 11:15 am
The Permanent Mission of India to the United NationsDocket: 10-627Issue(s): 1) Whether, in determining whether Congress authorized the Secretary of State ("Secretary") to preempt traditional state taxing powers by designating certain exemptions from state and local property tax laws under The Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
Title: Schering Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Sudbury, MA Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2005. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:45 am
But recently the Middle District of Tennessee rode to the rescue and delivered a useful opinion in a pain pump case, Rodriguez v. [read post]