Search for: "STATE v BOARD OF CO COMMISSIONERS" Results 401 - 420 of 582
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2011, 5:08 am by Holly Hayes
  However, due to the questionable holding of the United States Supreme Court in Prima Paint Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:13 am by NBlack
(See, 2009 Advisory Opinion 08-176 of the New York Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics, the Supreme Court of Ohio’s Board of Commissioners on Grievances & Discipline Opinion 2010-7, and the 2010 Ethics Committee of the Kentucky Judiciary Opinion JE-119). [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
 February 1, 2021 ​​ Appellate Division, First Department Appellate Divison affirms Charging Lien based upon account stated where no objection to invoices during year long representation               In Trafelet v Cipolla & Co., LLC, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 189200, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
 February 1, 2021 ​​ Appellate Division, First Department Appellate Divison affirms Charging Lien based upon account stated where no objection to invoices during year long representation               In Trafelet v Cipolla & Co., LLC, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 189200, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
Mr Bloom’s brief was to make recommendations to the Secretary of State on how government should engage with faith groups in England. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:08 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Title: Haskell County Board of Commissioners v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Dudas Issue: Whether the director of the Patent and Trademark Office lacked constitutional authority to appoint members of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, and, if so, whether the board’s decision below must be vacated as a result. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Without equivocation, Commissioner Aguilar stated that cyber security was a board responsibility. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Lev Sugarman
Military Departments on the state of the services. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am by Marie Louise
495/09 Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs (IPKat) A touch of class: Latest news of IP TRANSLATOR (IPKat) Beware the ‘own name’ defense – AG opinion in Edwin Co (Property, intangible) General Court: likelihood of confusion for Oyster and Oystra (Class 46) OHIM Board of Appeal: nasty decision about the comparison of goods – no likelihood of confusion between MALONE and MALOTE (Class 46) Can a European… [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has published updated guidance for using binding corporate rules as a data transfer mechanism. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am by Kelly
The FreeCycle Network (IPBiz) (IP Spotlight) District Court E D North Carolina grants defendant summary judgment on federal and state law trade mark infringement claims in The Daniel Group v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]