Search for: "STATE v FIELD"
Results 401 - 420
of 12,886
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2023, 6:04 am
Hong KongHKSAR v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:32 am
China Pacificarbide, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:24 am
In the field of affirmative action, O'Connor wrote two crucial 5-4 majority opinions restricting affirmative action in government contract (the Croson and Adarand cases), but also was the author of the 5-4 majority opinion in Grutter v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 10:14 am
Historically, certain areas of American law are subject to field preemption under the Supremacy Clause, where the will of Congress supersedes state legislation by occupying the field. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
The couple returned to the United States in 1957. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
” Kansas v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 1:08 pm
” City of Troy v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:56 am
(For example, the Carter Center report noted the Nigeria elections were marred by irregularities and sometimes by outright fraud, while the EU report noted the Zimbabwe elections were not held on a level playing field.). [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am
United States, 412 U.S. 521 (1973) Carlson v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:55 pm
Supreme Court ruling from Michigan v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 12:29 pm
Individual opinions expressed herein are solely those of our correspondents in the field, and do not necessarily reflect the views of JURIST’s editors, staff, donors or the University of Pittsburgh. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 10:27 am
But anything much higher than that seems, to most in the field, foolish. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:55 pm
In the Smith v. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 7:04 am
Therefore, the original complaint failed to state a cause of action for fraud” Ault v. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 1:42 am
In so doing, the court relied on the Division Bench[1]Novartis AG v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:51 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
A recent Washington Post column stated—misleadingly, if not just plain wrongly—that Google spent billions “to hide this setting from you. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 12:00 am
This technique was used, for example, by the ECtHR in X v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:23 am
It was a new field. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 2:00 am
The Claremont Canyon Conservancy v. [read post]
