Search for: "STATE v LANCE"
Results 401 - 420
of 442
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2008, 7:27 pm
I also thought it would be useful to consider what measures could have been undertaken to prevent the misunderstandings that led to the 3M v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 5:29 pm
Bernal, Lance L. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 8:12 pm
In this podcast with Lance Jacobs, an associate with Pepper's Washington office, who focuses his practice on federal, state and local tax matters, Lance discusses the details of this case and why this surprisingly taxpayer-favorable decision is interesting for businesses. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
Adams v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 4:23 pm
AOL Shopping has a Mac v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:44 pm
" NFP criminal opinions today (7): Lance Morningstar v. [read post]
26 May 2008, 3:43 am
Last Friday, five of the Justices ruled, in Providence Health Care Center v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:56 pm
[ii] See, e.g., State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 1:28 pm
Snyder v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 2:06 pm
United States) is the European court system's repudiation of the British military justice system in Findlay v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:17 am
They noted that based on the evidence it was not plain error for the district court to conclude that the deed at issue was void for lack of consideration.The Court stated in Kennedy Oil v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:17 am
They noted that based on the evidence it was not plain error for the district court to conclude that the deed at issue was void for lack of consideration.The Court stated in Kennedy Oil v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 1:44 am
Lance Hopkins won in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
Box 48314 Olympia, WA 98504-8314 Phone: (360) 586-3558; (800) 634-4473 (V/TTY/Toll Free) Web: www.wa.gov/ddc Helping Hands for the Disabled P.O. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 8:26 am
QR Spex, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 5:52 pm
In the abortion-protest context, the Supreme Court in Hill v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:23 am
& Prac. 4 Art. 1 *** Lance Jurich, Gregory Schwed and Christina M. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
While this may seem unjust, courts have also upheld the franchise tag as a valid practice. [25] Linebacker Wilbur Marshall challenged the validity by filing memorandum in federal court, where the designation was deemed fair and reasonable - the court stated that market conditions still favored players. [26] Seeing that the franchise tag is a valid practice, the players will have to seek a forum other than the courts to address their issue with the designation.… [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
The Parties The Complainant is Facebook Inc. of Palo Alto, California, the United States of America, represented by Heller Ehrman LLP, the United States of America. [read post]
