Search for: "STATE v PIERRE" Results 401 - 420 of 453
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2009, 6:40 am
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
(IP Osgoode)   United States US General IP outsourcing threatens national interest? [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 2:58 am
Other members of this conspiracy have already been indicted in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 7:22 pm
In addition, the agreement stated that "Carey International Ltd and/or assigns will pay a royalty fee of approximately 20% to John Thomas Financial and/or assigns. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:26 am
This number is likely misleading, however, because E. coli O157:H7 infections did not become a reportable disease in any state until 1987 when Washington became the first state to mandate its reporting. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
(ContentAgenda)   Scotland Franz Ferdinand sends Web-Sheriff after pirates (TorrentFreak) (Techdirt)   Singapore Sony Ericsson to be first in Singapore to sell major-label music files without DRM (ContentAgenda)   Sweden Pirate Bay’s tour bus to become court case press centre (TorrentFreak)   United Kingdom UK censors responses to piracy consultation (TorrentFreak) Framlingham College wins cybersquatting case against Canadian domain parkers Realm… [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 6:32 am
  As I discuss in footnote 12 of the copyright duration chart, however, a ruling in the Twin Books v Walt Disney case in the 9th Circuit (covering the western states) contradicts what everyone else assumes. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist)   Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court:… [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 10:53 am
Professor Cato interprets these Supreme Court decisions, especially the seminal Matthews v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Stanford University)Alexis Marcus (Northwestern University)Alvarez Fernando (University of Chicago)Andersen Torben (Northwestern University)Baliga Sandeep (Northwestern University)Banerjee Abhijit V. [read post]