Search for: "STATE v. BRENTS" Results 401 - 420 of 565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2021, 10:56 am by Giles Peaker
 Brent London Borough Council v Shulem B Association Ltd (2011) EWHC 1663 (Ch), (2011) 1 WLR 3014, and Skelton v DBS Homes (Kings Hill) Ltd (2017) EWCA Civ 1139, (2018) 1 WLR 362 both found the necessity of a valid demand for payment. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
In The Wall Street Journal, Brent Kendall reports that the court “agreed to consider New Jersey’s bid to legalize wagering on sports, a case in which the state is challenging restrictions imposed by the federal government. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
McDade, Balch & Bingham, LLP & Jason Brent Tompkins, Balch & Bingham, LLP, pro hac vice.ORDER AND REASONSMARTIN L. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
McDade, Balch & Bingham, LLP & Jason Brent Tompkins, Balch & Bingham, LLP, pro hac vice.ORDER AND REASONSMARTIN L. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 2:41 am
The Muluki Ain, 1963 (Code of Law), contains provisions against inter-state and domestic trafficking. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 2:01 pm by SOIssues
State of Indiana – (http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/04300901rdr.pdf) Todd Jensen v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
Lawyers' Ass'n; Brent Huber, Donald Snemis and Freedom Smith of Indianapolis, IN. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am by Dave
All of this tended to justify the subsequent authorities – R v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p Bassett (1983) 10 HLR 125; R v Brent LBC ex p Awua; R v Harrow LBC ex p Fahia; R v Camden LBC ex p Aranda (1997) 30 HLR 76; R v Hackney LBC ex p Ajayi (1997) 30 HLR 473 – in which different acts were said to have broken (or had the potential to break) the chain of causation from the earlier… [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 7:27 pm by cdw
The first look at the next edition’s case law: In favorem vitae State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 2:32 pm by Giles Peaker
R (OAO Harris) v London Borough of Islington. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 11:59 pm
Brent Coon, a principal in Brent Coon & Associates, alleges he was a partner in Provost Umphrey when the state reached a settlement agreement with the companies, and he is entitled to part of the $3.3 billion that will be split among lawyers who represented the state. [read post]
21 May 2020, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Pennsylvania and Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]