Search for: "STATE v. LEON"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,222
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2018, 12:43 am
The structure of s 117B(6) is straightforward because it unambiguously states that there is no public interest in removal where a person has a genuine and subsisting parental relationship with a qualifying child and it would not be reasonable to expect the child to leave the UK. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_09018.htm_________________Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from A Reasonable Disciplinary Penalty Under the Circumstances imposed on officers and employees of New York State and its political subdivisions. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_09018.htm_________________Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from A Reasonable Disciplinary Penalty Under the Circumstances imposed on officers and employees of New York State and its political subdivisions. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:37 am
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 88; Russo v Macchia-Schiavo, 72 AD3d 786; Martin v New York Hosp. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 6:17 am
Tool Touring, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 8:46 am
State v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 5:59 am
Accordingly, the complaint failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 10:48 am
In Rene Romo, et al v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:33 am
”), and (2) that under the state constitution, there is no good faith exception to the exclusionary rule, State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:33 pm
Circuit has spoken in Obama v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 9:00 pm
Ed. 2d at 696, quoting United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
California together with United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division, affirming the lower court ruling in each action, said that "When a party moves to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the standard is whether the pleading states a cause of action, not whether the proponent of the pleading has a cause of action," citing Sokol v Leader, 74 AD3d 1180. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division, affirming the lower court ruling in each action, said that "When a party moves to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the standard is whether the pleading states a cause of action, not whether the proponent of the pleading has a cause of action," citing Sokol v Leader, 74 AD3d 1180. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:07 pm
State of Indiana , a 9-page opinion, Judge Robb writes:Following a jury trial, Leon Kyles appeals his conviction of unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon, a Class B felony, and the jury's habitual offender finding. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:13 am
In Brown v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:13 am
In Brown v. [read post]
