Search for: "STATE v. RIVERA"
Results 401 - 420
of 713
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2009, 10:33 am
Soto and United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
"] Today the 11th Circuit decided Martinez-Rivera v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 10:20 pm
Rivera, 2008 NMSC 56, 144 N.M. 836, 192 P.3d 1213, 1218 (N.M. 2008); Sheriff v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Rivera v Joseph L. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Rivera v Joseph L. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 6:58 am
The teachers were disciplined for this, and the case makes it way to the State Court of Appeals.The case is Santer v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Licensing Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
Rivera Rivera se adoptó la doctrina acogida por el Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos en Smith v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 1:19 am
Franklin LoraBRONX COUNTYCriminal PracticeDepartment's Revocation of Inmate's Visitation Privileges Improper; Restoration OrderedMatter of Rivera v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:44 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Carlos Rivera-Hood v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:10 pm
EDMUND KIM, M.D., EDGARDO RIVERA, M.D. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 9:21 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:24 pm
It states in pertinent part: “A person who uses force as permitted in s. 776.012 (in defense of person), s. 776.013 (home protection), s. 776.031 (in defense of others) is justified in using such force and is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use of such force, unless the person against whom force was used is a law enforcement officer…” In 2010, in Dennis v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 8:43 am
In State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 5:05 pm
Sánchez Valle, 2015 T.S.P.R. 25, y la opinión concurrente del juez Juan Torruella en United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 9:39 am
First Federal E. coli Lawsuit – 2021.8.17_Braud v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:25 am
Rivera, 77 AD2d 538 [1st Dept 1980]); "or defendant's control over a premises" (Tirado, 47 AD2d at 195; People v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 8:05 am
LEXIS 49270, March 10, 2011) and dismissed a prisoner's claim that he was required, in violation of the Establishment Clause, to attend a faith-based AA and NA program as a condition of parole.In Rivera v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:16 pm
[Mexico][Habitual residence][Petition granted] In Sanchez v Peralta-Rangel, 2021 WL 984814 (E.D. [read post]
