Search for: "STATE v. WEAVER"
Results 401 - 420
of 512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2010, 6:01 pm
In Weaver v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 10:03 am
United States, 527 U.S. 1 (1999). [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:30 pm
Minton v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:04 pm
For this reason, the attempt to distinguish Weaver failed. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:04 pm
For this reason, the attempt to distinguish Weaver failed. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 5:41 am
Weaver, supra (citing Theofel v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Weaver (Louisville). [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:57 am
United States, 385 U.S. 206, 210; United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:49 am
., Weaver v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:59 am
On Wednesday, November 3, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court denied one application for leave to appeal, denied one motion for reconsideration, granted leave to the State Bar of Michigan and the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel to file briefs amicus curiae in Pellegrino v. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 8:55 am
Justices Corrigan and Young concurred, Justice Weaver dissented based on the dissent in McGraw. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 4:44 pm
Use of FBS in Cognitive Malingering The use of the Fake Bad Scale to support cognitive malingering may violate the National Academy of Neuropsychology published methods for assessing symptom validity which states “Invalid performance on a measure of personality” (such as the MMPI in this case) “cannot be used, a priori, to determine malingering of cognitive tests. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
The LSC argued it was, citing R (Corner House Research) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2005] EWCA Civ 192 and, of course, Weaver v London Quadrant Housing Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 235 (our report here). [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 9:08 am
Use of FBS in Cognitive Malingering The use of the Fake Bad Scale to support cognitive malingering may violate the National Academy of Neuropsychology published methods for assessing symptom validity which states “Invalid performance on a measure of personality” (such as the MMPI in this case) “cannot be used, a priori, to determine malingering of cognitive tests. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 4:11 am
I wonder whether a Weaver style argument could be deployed in defence of a case like this. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 6:32 am
The Michigan Supreme Court will hear oral argument this afternoon in Davis v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:50 am
More interesting to me is the sentencing issue raised in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 7:24 pm
Fla. 2007); Weaver v. [read post]
