Search for: "STREET v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 401 - 420
of 548
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 1:31 am
District for the District of Columbia against certain individual officers and directors of the now defunct Carlyle Capital Corp. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
District of Columbia, 468 A.2d at 1311. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:30 pm
As readers of this blog know, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:10 pm
Stetson v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:43 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit dismissed a tort case on political question grounds, required dismissal of the government’s removal case against Vides. [read post]
15 May 2011, 2:00 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit dismissed a tort case on political question grounds, required dismissal of the government’s removal case against Vides. [read post]
12 May 2011, 1:23 pm
“We had in the 1990s addicts dying in the streets, hundreds, some years more than one a day,” Craig Jones, lawyer for the government of British Columbia, told the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:34 pm
See, e.g., Zubulake v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:30 am
They really should teach 28 USC § 1446 at the Iowa MFA program.BIOGRAPHY: Ted Frank is an attorney licensed in Illinois, the District of Columbia, and California and a graduate of the the University of Chicago Law School. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:44 am
Please join me in telling Congress to refuse to reinstate the District of Columbia abortion ban by taking action today. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
., Municipal Lawyer, Summer 2009, Vol. 23, No. 2, published by the New York State Bar Association, One Elk Street, Albany, NY 12207 © 2009 New York State Bar Association. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:01 am
District Court for the District of Columbia Judge Beryl A. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:01 pm
Wednesday in the case of Bullcoming v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:25 pm
Recent case developments under Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, including the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Stone v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:38 am
Defendant relies on a recent decision by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit holding that prolonged GPS monitoring — 24 hours a day for four weeks — was a Fourth Amendment search and was unreasonable without a warrant. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:15 am
Powers v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
” The Washington Post reports that in the wake of District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
The most noteworthy case was the 2008 Supreme Court case titled District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
But in June, the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
