Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 21,160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
Thank you to "an anonymous friend" for bringing this case to my attention.In the context of a restitution motion, in United States of America v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 1:55 am
Best Buy Co Inc and another v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espa? [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 12:05 pm
In Cicorelli v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:07 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
In LifeScan Scotland, LTD v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:35 am
(See Georgia Dept. of Rev. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 1:34 pm
MSCHF appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 1:34 pm
MSCHF appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 8:59 am
Further, in a recent New York case, Burgers Bar Five Towns, LLC v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 7:48 am
Burgess v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:13 am
Regina (Sinclair Collis Ltd and another) v Secretary of State for Health [2011] EWCA Civ 437; [2011] WLR (D) 200 “The prohibition on the sale of tobacco from automatic vending machines was justified on the ground of the protection of public health, was proportionate and therefore did not violate EU law by its adverse effect on the business of the operators of vending machines and suppliers in other EU states. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:52 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:39 pm
In Schwartz v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:08 am
Ludwig Mies van der Rohe: so much name, so little chair ...Our friends in Curia have spared us an English version of Case C-516/13 Dimensione Direct Sales srl, Michele Labianca v Knoll International SpA, a Court of Justice of the European Union reference upon which Advocate General Pedro Cruz Villalón delivered his Opinion this morning. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
Until recently, the law had been settled that any sale (within the United States) of a product that included claimed features of an invention is prior art, even if the sale did not publicly disclose those claimed features. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:02 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:37 am
Supreme Court handed down its decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:22 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:33 am
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued perhaps the most significant and far-reaching decision affecting state sales and use tax collection since its Quill v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:32 pm
The Texas Third Court of Appeals heard oral argument today in Southwest Royalties, Inc. v. [read post]
