Search for: "San Jose California Supreme Court" Results 401 - 420 of 659
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2012, 10:39 am by Rob
  The California Supreme Court has flip-flopped on the issue at least once. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Kiran Bhat
Finally, Maura Dolan of the Los Angeles Times and Howard Mintz of the San Jose Mercury News report on possible next steps for supporters of Proposition 8. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:54 am by CJLF Staff
Some CA Judges Want More Say in New Sentencing Rules: Tracey Kaplan of San Jose Mercury News reports some California Superior Court judges are wanting to keep track of certain felons for a longer period of time than the new realignment plan calls for. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:43 am by Jeralyn
The state Supreme Court's rulings in the cases are likely to have a widespread impact in the Bay Area, where cities from San Jose to Oakland have regulations dealing with medical marijuana providers. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:15 pm by Rob
Griego & Associates 95 South Market Street, Suite 520 San Jose, CA 95113 South Bay: 408-293-6341 East Bay: 925-364-4655 Original article by Robert E. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Texas asked the San Antonio court to put its “interim” maps on hold while the state pursued a challenge directly in the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 10:05 am by Susan Brenner
In November of 2007, she and her boyfriend, Brendan Bisbee” moved to San Jose, California; and in 2007 Jeffrey Ruggiero, “a member of the United States Coast Guard, was stationed in Charleston, South Carolina”, where he met Jean Backus (“Jean”). [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 7:11 am by admin
  Yesterday’s post opened the New Year with the earthshaking news, reported among other places in the Los Angeles Times, that the California Supreme Court both upheld the California legislature’s elimination of the state’s redevelopment agencies (RDAs) and invalidated the reconstitution alternative the legislature had offered. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:13 am by Rob
Griego & Associates 95 South Market Street, Suite 520 San Jose, CA 95113 South Bay: 408-293-6341 East Bay: 925-364-4655 Original article by Robert E. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:37 am
"California Supreme Court allows redevelopment money grab": Howard Mintz of The San Jose Mercury News has this update. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:38 pm
The United States District Court in San Jose, California refused to grant a motion to dismiss which states that Facebook ads violate its user's right of publicity by utilizing their names and photographs without authorization. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 9:59 am
Ensuing Litigation In response to the passage of the Dissolution Bill and the Pay for Continuation Bill (the "Bills"), on July 15, 2011, the California Redevelopment Association, League of California Cities, City of Union City and the City of San Jose (collectively, "CRA") filed a Petition for Writ of Mandate to the California Supreme Court challenging the Legislature's adoption of the Bills and seeking an… [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
"California Supreme Court to decide Proposition 8 issue Thursday": Howard Mintz of The San Jose Mercury News has this update. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:22 am by The Complex Litigator
Here are a few examples of coverage of or opinions about the oral argument: Howard Mintz, California Supreme Court hears arguments in showdown over worker rest and meal breaks (November 8, 2011) San Jose Mercury News Alison S. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 5:48 am by Rob Robinson
http://bit.ly/sr2GcG (Katey Wood) Broken Hearted Early Discovery – http://bit.ly/rMPH8a (Josh Gilliland) California Cellphone Search Case Highlights Courts’ Tech Problems - http://bit.ly/rXKfIs (Kate Moser) Chief Judge Rader Introduces Proposed Model Order on eDiscovery In Patent Cases – http://bit.ly/vUJwjQ (Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney) Citing Orwell, Supreme Court Appears Wary of Police GPS Surveillance - http://bit.ly/usLE1j (Marcia Coyle)… [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:45 pm by Sam Favate
The California Supreme Court will consider this week whether state lawmakers violated the law when redevelopment funds were used to close a multi-billion dollar gap in the budget, the San Jose Mercury News reported. [read post]