Search for: "Satellite Holdings Company" Results 401 - 420 of 618
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2012, 4:27 pm by Charles Johnson
The classic fraud triangle theory holds that there generally must be three basic elements to exist for fraud to occur: opportunity, incentive/pressure and attitude/rationalization. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 12:11 pm by Everyday Law Staff
And what happens when your radioactive satellite falls on Canada? [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:32 pm by admin
  In this case, the Bureau took the position that advertised prices for some of Bell’s services, including home phone, Internet, satellite TV and wireless services, were not available and that additional mandatory fees were hidden in fine-print disclaimers. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:31 am by christopher
[This defense of Zygna not impressing me, for it is hard to back the valuation of a company that is"selling" imaginary goods. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:24 pm
The satellite office in Silicon Valley will be located among many of its Applicant's who hold enormous intellectual property portfolios. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:30 am
Holding: The trial court found that SASCO had brought the case in bad faith under California's version of the UTSA. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm by P.J. Blount
The companies producing the satellites must turn a substantial profit in order to continue the advancement of the industry within US borders. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:49 am by Caitlin A. Brennan
The winners in the satellite Patent Office sweepstakes were San Jose, California; Denver, Colorado; and Dallas, Texas. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:49 am by Caitlin A. Brennan
The winners in the satellite Patent Office sweepstakes were San Jose, California; Denver, Colorado; and Dallas, Texas. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 9:48 am by P.J. Blount
One instance of ITAR regulations unnecessarily getting in the way is when one company had to jump through the legal hoops in order to use a stand to hold a spacecraft before it had even launched.7 This stand was just an ordinary stand, and the director of the company said that if you “flip it upside down, put a tablecloth on it, it is indistinguishable from a coffee table. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:56 pm by Caitlin A. Brennan
I wouldn't hold my breath for an Alaskan Satellite location, but members of various USPTO oversight committees could perhaps, down the road, be persuaded that a satellite location in Hawaii would make sense. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:56 pm by Caitlin A. Brennan
I wouldn't hold my breath for an Alaskan Satellite location, but members of various USPTO oversight committees could perhaps, down the road, be persuaded that a satellite location in Hawaii would make sense. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 9:24 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(See "TUOL" post 7/8/11.)In 2007, the FCC tried to ease the three-decade-plus-old ban on cross-ownership of television stations and newspapers in the same market by a media company by permitting cross-ownership in the nation's 20 largest media markets provided that at least eight media outlets existed in the market to compete against such a multi-media company. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:38 am by Kyle Hulten
News Corporation elected to split the company’s holdings because they, “determined that creating this new structure would simplify operations and greater align strategic priorities. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 12:07 pm by Katherine J. Neikirk
Reid arose from a satellite business venture among the parties in the 1990s. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Patent No. 6,397,038 entitled SATELLITE BROADCAST RECEIVING AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM and owned by Global Communications. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Patent No. 6,397,038 entitled SATELLITE BROADCAST RECEIVING AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM and owned by Global Communications. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 4:47 pm by Ryan Radia
At the same time, established media businesses—including cable operators, satellite providers, telecom companies, broadcast networks and affiliates, and studios—should compete on a level playing field, free from both federal mandates and special regulatory treatment. [read post]